Rahm can't explain what "illegal" means
Esther Solomon nails Emanuel on the obvious trap door: when he promised to sanction "illegal settlements," did he mean illegal under international law or Israeli law?
Turns out the answer is neither. It's a secret third thing nobody's allowed to know.
This is the tell. Every time a US politician gets asked to actually define what they mean on Israeli settlements, they disappear into word soup. That's not confusion. That's calculation. The entire career depends on keeping it vague enough that everyone can project their own definition onto the commitment.
Politicians with real principles can answer in five seconds. Politicians with none tie themselves in knots.
note to journalists planning to interview rahm emanuel: a good question to ask him is what he meant in today's tel aviv speech when he called for sanctions on companies connected to "illegal settlements" - "illegal" under israeli law (i.e. unauthorized outposts) or "illegal settlements" under international law?
Source
x.com