Everyone agrees Al Qaeda and ISIS torched Islam's image. Same logic applied to Israel and Jewish people? Suddenly it's antisemitic. The difference isn't the argument. It's who's allowed to make it and who gets buried for it. Institutional credibility determines whose statement gets clipped, decontextualized, and weaponized versus whose gets a pass. This is the actual pattern across the Piker pile-on: the argument matters less than the speaker's status and who benefits from destroying them.